The High Court at Madras dismissed a Civil Suit filed by M/s. Ravivarma Traders against defendants for non-prosecution as there was no representation by the plaintiff on the day set for dismissal.
The civil suit was dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 12.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.S.No.45 of 1994
M/s.Ravivarma Traders .. Plaintiff
vs.
(a) granting a decree of permanent injunction restraining 1st defendant from in any manner invoking or collecting payment under the Suit Bank Guarantee No.30/89-90 dated 1989,
(b) granting a decree for permanent injunction restraining 2nd defendant from paying out any amount to the 1st defendant under the Suit Bank Guarantee and
( c ) directing the defendants to pay the costs of the suit.
For Plaintiff : No appearance
1/3
For Defendants : Mr. M. Chandru for D1
for M/s.King & Patridge
Set exparte on 09.09.2016 - D2
J U D G M E N T
Earlier, when the Suit was posted on 05.07.2023 for hearing, there
was no representation for the plaintiff and hence, the matter was directed to
be posted on 12.07.2023 under the caption, “for dismissal”.
12.07.2023
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes Speaking/Non-speaking order gv
2/3
A.A.NAKKIRAN,J. gv
C.S.No.45 of 1994
12.07.2023
3/3
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
