In the absence of any representation or counsel for the plaintiffs during hearings on 25.07.2023 and 26.07.2023, the High Court dismissed the pending civil suit for non-prosecution.
The civil suit was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the plaintiffs without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CS.No.321 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-07-2023
CORAM
HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.S. No.321 of 2008
Prayer : Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. For Plaintiffs : No appearance For Defendants : No appearance
1/3
CS.No.321 of 2008
J U D G M E N T
Earlier, when the Suit was posted on 25.07.2023 for hearing, there was no representation for the plaintiffs and hence, the matter was directed to be posted on 26.07.2023 under the caption, “for dismissal”.
26.07.2023
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes Speaking/Non-speaking order gv
2/3
CS.No.321 of 2008
A.A.NAKKIRAN,J. gv
C.S.No.321 of 2008
26.07.2023
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 and Order VII Rule 1 CPC should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi Prakash Khemka
Champa Devi
Shashi Prakash
Sushila Devi
Rattan Kumar Khemka
Nirmala Devi
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
