C.Sarasvathi v. C.Kannan
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, dismissed a civil revision petition filied under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as infructuous. The court closed connected miscellaneous petitions without costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.911 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.911 of 2019
and C.M.P.(MD) No.5240 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD) Nos.13138, 13171 and 13172 of 2023
C.Sarasvathi .. Petitioner/2nd Respondent/ 2nd Plaintiff Vs. 1.C.Kannan .. 1st Respondent/Petitioner/ 3rd Party 2.C.Subbulakshmi .. 2nd Respondent/1st Respondent/ 1st Plaintiff
- 3.Tiruchirapali City Municipal Corporation, Rep., by its Commissioner, Cantonment, Trichy-01.
- 4.The Assistant Commissioner, K.Abhisekapuram Zone, Tiruchirapalli City Municipal Corporation, Cantonment, Trichy-01. .. Respondents 3 & 4/ Respondents 3 & 4/Defendants
_________Page 1 of 4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
whether the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Sarasvathi
- respondent
1.C.Kannan
- respondent
2.C.Subbulakshmi
- respondent
Tiruchirapali City Municipal Corporation
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, K.Abhisekapuram Zone
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court