Disposed

K. Angelo, v. The Chit Registrar (South)

Madras HC5 Jan 2023CRP(MD)/877/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This was a civil revision petition against a chit proceeding settlement. The High Court closed the petition after parties mediated and settled the dispute, with the petitioner providing a payment of Rs. 50,000 as part payment of the total settlement amount.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition was closed with no costs as the underlying dispute was settled via mediation.

K. Angelo, Vs The Chit Registrar (South) — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CRP(PD)(MD)No.877 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 05.01.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRP(PD)(MD)No.877 of 2022 and CMP(MD)No.3486 of 2022

¶7

K.Angelo

¶8

L.Kannan

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

versus

¶11

The Chit Registrar (South), Office of the District Registrar, 171, Palace Road,

¶12

Madurai South

¶13

Madurai – 1.

¶14

Margadharasi Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Foreman, No.19, A.A.Road, Gnanolipuram, Madurai.

¶15

Arul Ganesh

¶16

T.Jagatheeswaran

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.7903/E3/2021 dated 07.12.2021 of the Joint Chief Registrar, Madurai South and seeking a direction to the Chit Registrar, Madurai South to number the

¶19

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

CRP(PD)(MD)No.877 of 2022

¶22

application filed to set aside the ex parte order passed in C.D.No.27 of 2015 along with the condone delay application and dispose of the Chit Case in C.D.No.27 of 2015 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶23

For Petitioners : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu For R1 : Mr.A.Kannan, Additional Govt. Pleader For R2 : Mr.R.Devaraj

¶24

ORDER

¶25

The revision petitioners are defendants 2 and 3 in the Chit Proceedings in C.D.No.27 of 2015, which is pending on the file of the Chit Registrar, Madurai South.

¶26

The petitioners, with a grievance that the above chit

¶27

proceedings was decided ex parte , has filed an application to set aside the ex parte order dated 27.10.2015 passed in C.D.No.27 of 2015 along with an application to condone the delay. The said application was not entertained by the trial Court. Aggrieved over that, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRP(PD)(MD)No.877 of 2022

¶31

Pending the Civil Revision Petition, at the request of the learned counsel on either side, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre attached to this Bench. Mediation report has been filed that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. Pursuant to the same, the petitioners gave a cheque for a sum of Rs.50,000/- in favour of the second respondent Company as part payment of his settlement (Cheque No.761926, dated 26.09.2022). The petitioners have also agreed to pay the balance amount of Rs.1,66,954/- (Rupees one lakh sixty six thousand nine hundred and fifty four only) on or before 31.01.2023 which is agreeable to the second respondent.

¶32

In view of the subsequent development, the Civil Revision

¶33

Petition is closed as no further orders are required. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶34

05.01.2023

¶35

ogy Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

CRP(PD)(MD)No.877 of 2022

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

The Joint Chief Registrar, Madurai South.

¶43

The Chit Registrar, Madurai South

¶44

The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶45

CRP(PD)(MD)No.877 of 2022

¶46

05.01.2023

¶47

4/4

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K. Angelo, v. The Chit Registrar (South)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Angelo, v. The Chit Registrar (South)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C. Stalin Raja, Vs Sri Krishna Bankers

K.Dhanasekaran, Vs W. Sudir

P.Ponram, Vs M.Santhanam

J. Rajkumar, Vs Nil

Maria Sam Jeeno, Vs Muthupackiam

S.Palanisamy, Vs S.Murugaian