The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition and closed the connected miscellaneous petition as infructuous because execution proceedings had terminated and delivery had been effected before the present order was passed.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(PD)(MD)No.770 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 31.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(PD)(MD)No.770 of 2022 and CMP(MD)No.3100 of 2022
Panchavarnam ... Petitioner
versus
Subbulakshmi
... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 20.04.2021 passed in I.A.No.20 of 2018 in R.C.O.P.No.45 of 2015 by the learned District Munsif Judge, Ramanathapuram.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Maheswaran
For Respondent : Mr.S.Senthil Kumar
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned
counsel for the respondent submits that the Execution Proceedings in
1/3
CRP(PD)(MD)No.770 of 2022
E.P.No.7 of 2017 itself has been terminated and delivery has also been effected on 20.10.2021. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
31.01.2023
ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
2/3
CRP(PD)(MD)No.770 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
CRP(PD)(MD)No.770 of 2022
31.01.2023
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Panchavarnam
Subbulakshmi
B.Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
