S.Muthu, v. U.Moorthy
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition challenging an election order was closed with no costs as the election period had expired, leaving nothing to survive for adjudication.
What did the court decide?
No costs; Civil Revision Petition stands closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD).No.630 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 13.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.630 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2015
S.Muthu ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.U.Moorthy 2.S.Kasinathadurai
- 3.K.Arumugam
4.Returning Officer/Block Development Officer, Thiruvadanai Panchayat Union, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District. .... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 12.03.2015 passed in E.L.O.P.No.1 of 2012 by Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram with costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Muthu
- respondent
U.Moorthy
- respondent
S.Kasinathadurai
- respondent
K.Arumugam
- respondent
Returning Officer/Block Development Officer, Thiruvadanai Panchayat Union
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court