Sivagami v. Kumarababu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to withdraw a Civil Revision Petition praying to strike off a plaint. This Court allowed withdrawal and disposed of the matter.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.570 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.570 of 2018
and C.M.P.(MD) No.2529 of 2018 Sivagami .. Petitioner/1st defendant Vs. 1.Kumarababu .. 1st Respondent/Plaintiff 2.Kannan 3.Mahalakshmi 4.Lakshmi 5.Muthumari .. Respondents 2 to 5/ Defendants 2 to 5
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.45 of 2017 on the file of the District Court, Tiruchirappalli.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran RR1, 3 & 4 : Unserved For RR2 & 5 : No appearance _________Page 1 of 4
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.570 of 2018
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sivagami
- respondent
Kumarababu
Coram
BATTU DEVANAND
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court