Revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to strike out a plaint under Section 9 of CPC was disposed of. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioners failed to appear on the two hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD).No.484 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.03.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRP(MD).No. 484 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD).No.2340 of 2023
1.Muthulakshmi 2.S.Jothilakshmi
.. Petitioners/Petitioners
Vs.
1.S.Chandran 2.Hariharasudan .. Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER : Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to strike out the plaint in O.S.No.230 of 2022 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Valliyoor.
. For Petitioners : No appearance
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing yesterday i.e, 28.02.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and hence, the matter is listed today (i.e., 01.03.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the
1/3
CRP(MD).No.484 of 2023
petitioners. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for
default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
01.03.2023
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Rmk
To
The Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor.
2/3
CRP(MD).No.484 of 2023
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.,
Rmk
Order made in CRP(MD).No.484 of 2023
Dated: 01.03.2023
Muthulakshmi and S. Jothilakshmi
S. Chandran and Hariharasudan
R. VIJAYAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
