Allowed

Pulagayeeammal v. P.Bhoopathi (died) 1. Ponnudurai

Madras HC17 Nov 2023CRP(MD)/3005/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed a civil revision petition under Article 226/227 directing the Subordinate Court, Sivakasi, to conduct an enquiry and dispose of a pending application in a partition suit within one month.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi, to conduct an enquiry and dispose of I.A.No.17/2020 in O.S.No.59/2010 within one month.

Pulagayeeammal Vs P.Bhoopathi (died) 1. Ponnudurai — Partition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.3005 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 17.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

C.R.P.(MD)No.3005 of 2023

¶7

Pulugayeeammal ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

P.Bhoopathi (died)

¶10

Ponnudurai 2. Chinna Bhoopathi 3. B.Arumaithai

¶11

B.Thirupathi

¶12

Thirunirai Selvan

¶13

Sanmugathai ... Respondents

¶14

Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Court of Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District to dispose the case in I.A.No.17 of 2020 in O.S.No. 59 of 2010 within the stipulated time.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothi Basu

¶16

1/6

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

C.R.P.(MD)No.3005 of 2023

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to dispose of the application in I.A.No.17 of 2020 in O.S.No.59 of 2010, pending on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District, within a period stipulated by this Court.

¶21

Since the revision petition is filed for early disposal of the case, the issuance of notice to the respondents is not necessary.

¶22

The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that the revision petitioner has filed a suit in O.S.No.17 of 2005 for partition before the District Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputtur and that thereafter, the case was transferred to the Subordinate Court, Sivakasi and was renumbered as O.S.No.59 of 2010 and when the suit was pending for trial, due to the absence of the revision petitioner, the same was ordered to be dismissed for default on 05.04.2011.

¶23

It is further evident that the revision petitioner has filed an application in I.A.No.7 of 2012 to restore the suit along with the application to condone the delay in filing the restoration application and

¶24

2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

C.R.P.(MD)No.3005 of 2023

¶26

that the same was ordered to be dismissed on 09.04.2012 and against the dismissal order, the revision petitioner has preferred a revision in C.R.P. (MD)No.2342 of 2012 before this Court and this Court, vide order dated 22.11.2019, has allowed the revision and thereby setting aside the order passed in I.A.No.7 of 2012 and further directed the trial Court to dispose of the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of that order.

¶27

The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that the trial Court has taken the application on file filed under Order 9 Rule 9 C.P.C. in I.A.No.17 of 2020 and the same is pending for the past three years.

¶28

Considering the above and also the fact that the suit is of the year 2005 and the restoration application is pending for the past three years, the learned Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi, is hereby directed to conduct an enquiry in I.A.No.17 of 2020 in O.S.No.59 of 2010 and dispose of the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶29

3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

C.R.P.(MD)No.3005 of 2023

¶31

With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed

¶32

of. No costs.

¶33

17.11.2023

¶34

NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm

¶35

¶36

The Subordinate Court, Sivakasi.

¶37

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶38

4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

C.R.P.(MD)No.3005 of 2023

¶40

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

C.R.P.(MD)No.3005 of 2023

¶42

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

¶43

csm

¶44

Order made in C.R.P.(MD)No.3005 of 2023

¶45

Dated : 17.11.2023

¶46

6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Pulagayeeammal v. P.Bhoopathi (died) 1. Ponnudurai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pulagayeeammal v. P.Bhoopathi (died) 1. Ponnudurai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Kaathammal, Vs S. Susi Pradeep

Dharmathurai, Vs Asiya Ammal

Dharmathurai Vs T.Balaji

Kalaimani Vs Rahinidevi

Mary Ajantha Vs Delcy Micheal

Ragav Vs Gayathri