Dismissed

A.Mathu, v. P.v.Raveendran

Madras HC8 Feb 2023CRP(MD)/291/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petition filed to set aside an order dismissing the impleadment of proposed third parties who purchased property pendente lite in a declaration suit. Court dismissed the petition finding no question requiring adjudication and directed parties to file second appeal if advised.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed. Proposed parties at liberty to file second appeal with leave. Connected C.M.P. closed.

A.Mathu, Vs P.v.Raveendran — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No.291 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 08.02.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.291 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.1402 of 2023

¶7

A.Mathu ... Petitioner/ Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.P.V.Raveendran 2.R.Srinath

¶10

3.Maria Puravince of S.A.D. ... Respondents/Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.3 of 2022 in A.S.No.4 of 2022 on the file of Sub Court, Periyakulam by allowing this Civil Revision Petition.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.Raja Karthikeyan For R3 : Mr.A.Siva Subramanian

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

C.R.P(MD)No.291 of 2023

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The third party to a suit had filed an application in a pending first appeal seeking to implead themselves on the ground that they have purchased the property from the defendants 1 and 2 pending suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. The 1^st appellate Court had rightly dismissed the said application on the ground that the proposed parties are pendente lite purchasers and they have no right to get themselves impleaded in the suit. According to the learned counsel appearing for the caveator, first appeal itself has been disposed of on 01.12.2022.

¶18

In view of the above said facts, nothing requires to be adjudicated in this revision petition Hence, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. However, the proposed parties are at liberty to file second appeal with the leave of the Court, if they are so advised. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶19

08.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gbg

¶20

2/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

C.R.P(MD)No.291 of 2023

¶23

¶24

1.The Sub Court, Periyakulam.

¶25

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶26

3/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

C.R.P(MD)No.291 of 2023

¶29

R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.

¶30

gbg

¶31

Order made in C.R.P(MD)No.291 of 2023

¶32

08.02.2023

¶33

4/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Mathu, v. P.v.Raveendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Mathu, v. P.v.Raveendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Albert Vs Palayyan

Justin Nirmalkumar, Vs Rama Reddiar

N.Nagarathinavel Vs Saroja (Died)

Paramakudi Sami Chettiyar Nanthavanam Vs T.S.Megarajan

K.Sarojini Vs G.Pethanasamy

D. Thangaraj Pandian, Vs v. Chandrakumar