In a civil revision petition seeking reversal of an order dismissing an injunction application, the High Court directed the trial court to complete the trial of the pending suit, filed in 2004, within three months.
Directed the trial court to complete the trial and dispose of the suit within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)No.2688 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 30.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
C.R.P.(MD)No.2688 of 2023 and
C.M.P(MD)No.14010 of 2023
Sengulathupatti Kannimarkovil, Periyasamy Kovil, Vinayagar Kovil, represented by its Poosari and Trustee, Vedasandur Taluk, Mullampatti, Kalathu Veedu, S.Gopal : Petitioner/Appellant/ Petitioner/Plaintiff
Vs.
Periyasamy : Respondent/Respondent/ Respondent/Defendant
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to reverse and set aside the fair order and decreetal order in C.M.A.No.3 of 2022 against I.A.No.287 of 2021 in O.S.No.260 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Vedasandur Taluk, dated 22.06.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh
ORDER
C.R.P.(MD)No.2688 of 2023
The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order passed in C.M.A.No.3 of 2022, dated 22.06.2023 on the file of the Sub Court,
Vedasandur Taluk, confirming the order, dated 18.02.2022 in I.A.No.287 of 2021 in O.S.No.260 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur Taluk, dismissing the petition filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C.
C.R.P.(MD)No.2688 of 2023
30.10.2023
NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No das
C.R.P.(MD)No.2688 of 2023
To
C.R.P.(MD)No.2688 of 2023
K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.
das
Order made in C.R.P.(MD)No.2688 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.14010 of 2023
Dated : 30.10.2023
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court failed to dispose of a suit pending since 2004 expeditiously.
Whether the High Court should direct the trial court to complete the trial within a specific timeframe under Article 227.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sengulathupatti Kannimarkovil, Periyasamy Kovil, Vinayagar Kovil
Periyasamy
K.Murali Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
