K.Loga Senthil v. Sangeetha
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners filed a civil revision petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions for the early disposal of a pending divorce petition. The High Court refused to fix a disposal time, observing insufficient data on court pendency.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)No.2664 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
C.R.P.(MD)No.2664 of 2023
K.Loga Senthil
... Petitioner
Vs.
Sangeetha
... Respondent
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct learned Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam to dispose the H.M.O.P.No.233 of 2022, within a time frame fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Mani
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to fix a time frame for the disposal of a pending matrimonial case pending before the trial court absent total pendency particulars.
Whether the High Court should direct the trial court to expedite the disposal of the case.
Whether the applicant should approach the trial court to seek priority disposal based on judicial circulars.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Loga Senthil
- respondent
Sangeetha
Coram
K.Murali Shankar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court