The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition challenging an order dismissing a counter claim. The Court held that the lower court correctly relied on a Supreme Court precedent disallowing counter claims after issue framing.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed with no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)No.2559 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
C.R.P.(MD)No.2559 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.13236 of 2023
Senthilkumar : Petitioner/Petitioner/ Defendant
Vs.
Jeyaratchagan : Respondent/Respondent/ Plaintiff
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.3 of 2023 in O.S.No.272 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Aruppukottai, dated 01.06.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order passed in I.A.No.3 of 2023 in O.S.No.272 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Aruppukottai, dated 01.06.2023., dismissing the counter claim.
C.R.P.(MD)No.2559 of 2023
C.R.P.(MD)No.2559 of 2023
05.10.2023
NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No das
To
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
C.R.P.(MD)No.2559 of 2023
K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.
das
Order made in C.R.P.(MD)No.2559 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.13236 of 2023
Dated : 05.10.2023
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Principal District Munsif Court correctly dismissed the counter claim filed after the framing of issues during defendant side evidence.
Whether the Civil Revision Petition challenging that order has any merits.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashok Kumar Kalra Vs. Wing CDR.Surendra Agnohotri and othersRelied on¶4
2020 (2) CTC 437
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Senthilkumar
Jeyaratchagan
K. Murali Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
