Dismissed

R.Ganesan v. R.Rukmangathan

Madras HC23 Nov 2023CRP(MD)/2188/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging an order appointing an Advocate Commissioner in a suit for permanent injunction. The court held that the inspection report had been submitted and the trial had commenced, rendering the petition unsustainable.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition and the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition were dismissed and closed.

R.Ganesan Vs R.Rukmangathan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No.2188 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

¶6

C.R.P(MD) No.2188 of 2019 and C.M.P. (MD) No.11412 of 2019

¶7

1.R.Ganesan 2.R.Balu 3.R.Kannan ...Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

R.Rukmangathan ...Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 03.09.2019 passed in I.A.No.717 of 2019 in O.S.No.311 of 2018 on

¶11

1/6

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

C.R.P(MD)No.2188 of 2019

¶14

the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam, and allow this Civil Revision Petition.

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr.N.R.Balaji

¶16

For Respondent : Mrs.P.Yasmin Begum

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 03.09.2019 passed in I.A.No.717 of 2019 in O.S.No.311 of 2018 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court,

¶19

Kumbakonam.

¶20

The Revision Petitioners are the defendants and the

¶21

respondent is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.311 of 2018 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam, filed for permanent injunction and also for mandatory injunction against the defendants not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit properties. In the said suit, the plaintiff filed

¶22

2/6

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.R.P(MD)No.2188 of 2019

¶25

an Interlocutory Application in I.A.No.717 of 2019 seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner. After hearing both sides, the Court below allowed the I.A.No.717 of 2019 by order, dated 03.09.2019 appointing the Advocate Commissioner to make a local inspection of the suit property. Assailing the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.

¶26

During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for

¶27

the respondent submits that in the light of the order, dated 03.09.2019 passed in I.A.No.717 of 2019, the Advocate Commissioner executed warrant and submitted a report to the Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam on 19.07.2023.

¶28

On consideration of the same, it appears that the Civil Revision Petition is filed in the year 2019 and there is no stay granted by this Court and under those circumstances, the Advocate Commissioner appointed by the Court below has executed warrant and submitted his report on 19.07.2023.

¶29

3/6

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

C.R.P(MD)No.2188 of 2019

¶32

The learned counsel for the respondent also submitted

¶33

that in the suit trial is commenced and it is posted for cross examination of P.W.1. Under these circumstances, in our considered view nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed.

¶34

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed.

¶35

No costs.

¶36

Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition

¶37

is closed.

¶38

23.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No RM

¶39

4/6

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

C.R.P(MD)No.2188 of 2019

¶42

¶43

1.The Principal District Munsif, Principal District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam.

¶44

5/6

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

C.R.P(MD)No.2188 of 2019

¶47

BATTU DEVANAND, J.

¶48

¶49

C.R.P(MD) No.2188 of 2019

¶50

23.11.2023

¶51

6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Ganesan v. R.Rukmangathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Ganesan v. R.Rukmangathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Mathubala, Vs a.Kalarani

Kader batcha Vs Firose Banu

M.Ravi Vs M.Sharafitheen Ahamed

Mrs. R. Gowri Vs Mr. R. Nallaiyan

M.Muthukrishnan Vs Union of India

N.Ratna @ Raji, Vs R.Kannan