Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution were dismissed as infructuous because the underlying civil suit had been disposed of during the pendency of the petitions.
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P(MD)Nos.2140 & 2141 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.02.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
C.R.P(MD)Nos.2140 & 2141 of 2013 and
M.P(MD)Nos.2 of 2013 and 1 & 1 of 2014
1.R.Devendran
2.Seematty Devendran The petitioners are represented through their Power of Attorny Holder T.Peter Joshua.
... Petitioners
(In Both Cases)
Vs.
1.S.Ravichandran 2.K.Sathishkumar 3.M/s.Star Enterprises, Partnership Firm, Represented by its Partners Respondents 1 and 2 herein, No.5/97C/1, Nethaji Nagar 9th Street, Tuticorin-628 002 1/15, Bryant Nagar 5th Street (Middle), Tuticorin-628 008. ... Respondents (In Both Cases)
1/4
C.R.P(MD)Nos.2140 & 2141 of 2013
PRAYER in C.R.P(MD)No.2140 of 2013: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 17.09.2013 passed in I.A.No.39 of 2013 in O.S.No.38 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Tuticorin, by allowing this Civil Revision Petition and to grant such other relief or reliefs as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
PRAYER in C.R.P(MD)No.2141 of 2013: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 17.09.2013 passed in Memo in O.S.No.38 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Tuticorin, by allowing this Civil Revision Petition and to grant such other relief or reliefs as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
(In Both Cases)
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aravinthan For Respondents : No appearance
COMMON ORDER
Today when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Counsel
appearing for the petitioner submitted that O.S.No.38 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Tuticorin was disposed of on
2/4
C.R.P(MD)Nos.2140 & 2141 of 2013
04.08.2022. Hence, both the Civil Revision Petitions stand dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.
15.02.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Btr
To
1.The II Additional District Judge, Tuticorin. 2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4
C.R.P(MD)Nos.2140 & 2141 of 2013
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
Btr
Order made in C.R.P(MD)Nos.2140 & 2141 of 2013
15.02.2023
4/4
R Devendran and Seematty Devendran
S Ravichandran and K Sathishkumar
LVictoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
