Dismissed

T. Malliga, v. v. Pon Saranya

Madras HC23 Jan 2023CRP(MD)/1844/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition challenging Divorce Case proceedings was disposed of. The Court noted that parties resolved their dispute post-filing via a joint compromise memo for mutual consent divorce, finding no need to entertain the revision under Article 227 in light of a Full Bench judgment.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; parties directed to work out remedy before appropriate forum; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

T. Malliga, Vs v. Pon Saranya — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CRP PD(MD)No.1844 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.01.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRP(MD)No.1844 of 2021 and CMP(MD) No.9888 of 2021

T.Malliga

... Petitioner

1.V.Pon Saranya 2.T.Rajasekar

¶11

... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to the case in D.V.C.No.6 of 2021, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Tuticorin and strike out the same as against the petitioner herein.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.V.J.Kumaravel For R1 : Mr.Ka.Ramakrishnan For R2 : Mr.K.Neelamegam

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRP PD(MD)No.1844 of 2021

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Civil Revision Petition is filed as against the

¶19

proceedings D.V.C.No.6 of 2021, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate

¶20

Court No.II, Tuticorin.

¶21

2.Today(23.01.2023), when the matter is taken up for

¶22

hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pending this Civil Revision Petition, the parties have resolved their dispute and the respondents, who are the son and daughter-in-law of the petitioner herein are intended to file an application for divorce on mutual co nsent. The learned counsel has also produced the joint compromise memo to that effect.

¶23

3.In view of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, recording the joint compromise memo filed by the parties and also taking into consideration of the Judgment of the Honourable

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

CRP PD(MD)No.1844 of 2021

¶27

Full Bench of this Court in the reference made in Crl.O.P.SR.Nos. 31852 of 2022, etc. (batch), dated 17.11.2022, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Civil Revision Petition.

¶28

4.Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. The parties are at liberty to work out their remedy before the appropriate Forum. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶29

23.01.2023

¶30

Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn To The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Tuticorin

¶31

3/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

CRP PD(MD)No.1844 of 2021

¶34

B.PUGALENDHI, J.