Dismissed

P. Kannan v. K. Thamilarasi

Madras HC18 Jul 2023CRP(MD)/1273/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision filed by the petitioner against an order allowing his application for the appearance of the respondent in a rent case. The court observed that the underlying rent case was dismissed as abated, rendering the present petition futile.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

P. Kannan Vs K. Thamilarasi — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No.1273 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 18.07.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.1273 of 2018 and C.M.P(MD)No.5362 of 2018

¶7

P.Kannan ...Petitioner/Petitioner/ Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

K.Thamilarasi ...Respondent/Respondent/ Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to modify the order passed in the fair and decreetal order dated 19.04.2018 made in I.A.No.56 of 2018 in R.C.A.No.3 of 2017 on the file of the learned Principal Sub Judge, Karur.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.M.Xavier For Respondent : Mr.M.P.Senthil

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This civil revision petition has been filed against the order passed

¶14

by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Karur in I.A.No.56 of 2018 in R.C.A.No.3 of 2017, dated 19.04.2018.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

C.R.P(MD)No.1273 of 2018

¶18

The petitioner herein has filed an application before the Trial Court. It appears that the respondent herein has given a power of attorney in favour of one Nalla Nayagam. The petitioner herein apprehended that the respondent, namely, K.Thamilarasi was not at all alive. Therefore, for proper adjudication of the matter, he filed an application for the appearance of the landlord. The same was objected on the ground that the very application has been filed to prolong the litigation.

¶19

However, the learned Trial Judge after gone into the merits of the case and also the certificate given by the Malaysian Government as to the presence of the K.Thamilarasi, has allowed the application with a direction to the petitioner to pay Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) towards the travel expenses of K.Thamilarasi.

¶20

Aggrieved with the order, the petitioner has come up with the instant civil revision petition.

¶21

At this juncture, the leaned counsel for the respondent has submitted the status report of the e-Courts, wherein, the very same R.C.A has been dismissed as abated.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/4

¶24

C.R.P(MD)No.1273 of 2018

¶25

Therefore, nothing survives in this matter. Hence, this Civil

¶26

Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶27

18.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sn

¶28

¶29

1.The learned Principal Sub Judge, Karur.

¶30

2.The Section Officer Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/4

¶33

C.R.P(MD)No.1273 of 2018

¶34

C.KUMARAPPAN,J.

¶35

¶36

C.R.P(MD)No.1273 of 2018

¶37

18.07.2023

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

4/4

P. Kannan v. K. Thamilarasi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Kannan v. K. Thamilarasi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karunakaran, Vs the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Society

R.Bhubanesh Raja, Vs R.Edwin

G.Mohandoss, Vs Mala

Ganapathiya Pillai (Died) Vs Abdul Ali

T.Selvaraj, Vs S.K.Gurusamy

Sangeetha,W/O.Shambukumaran, Vs Panneerselvam @ Muthukrishnan