The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the underlying suit had already been disposed of on 17.09.2019, leaving nothing to survive the revision.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P(MD)No.1049 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.08.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
C.R.P(MD)No.1049 of 2019 and C.M.P(MD)No.5753 of 2019
1.A.Muhameed Nahib (Died)
2.A.Muhameed Nainar 3.A.Muhameed Nazer 4.M.Sabika Bagam ...Petitioners/Defendants Vs.
1.A.Mohamed Vazik Power Agent of Abdul Samadh 2.A.Jesima Barvin ...Respondents/Plaintiffs
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order made in the counter claim petition filed by the petitioners herein O.S.No.33 of 2010 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Kodaikanal.
For Petitioners : Mr.T.R.Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.H.Arumugam
1/3
C.R.P(MD)No.1049 of 2019
ORDER
The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the suit has been disposed on 17.09.2019, which factum was also conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
01.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sn
To
2.The Section Officer Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
2/3
C.R.P(MD)No.1049 of 2019
C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
SN
C.R.P(MD)No.1049 of 2019
01.08.2023
3/3
A.Muhameed Nainar
A.Jesima Barvin
C.KUMARAPPAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
