Dismissed

Perumal v. Arumugathammal

Madras HC3 Aug 2023CRP(MD)/1020/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition under Article 227 for default. The court noted the absence of the petitioner's counsel, the death of the first petitioner, and the inability to locate or obtain representation from the remaining petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Civil revision petition dismissed for default with no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Perumal Vs Arumugathammal — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No.1020 of 2017

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 03.08.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.1020 of 2017 and C.M.P(MD)No.4573 of 2017

¶7

1.Perumal

¶8

2.Karunal Maharaja

¶9

3.Ganesan ...Petitioners/Petitioners/ Plaintiffs

Vs.

1.Arumugathammal

2.Valliraja

3.Muthu

...Respondents 1 to 3/ Respondents 1 to 3/ Defendants

¶15

4.Koilpillai

¶16

5.Chandra

¶17

...Respondents 4 & 5/ Respondents 4 & 5/ Proposed Defendants

¶18

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.127 of 2017 dated 03.04.2017 in O.S.No.40 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif, Srivaikundam.

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

1/4

¶21

C.R.P(MD)No.1020 of 2017

¶22

For Petitioner : No Appearance

¶23

For R2, R4 & R5 : Mr.M.Sengu Vijay

¶24

ORDER

¶25

The learned counsel who appeared for the petitioner has reported no instructions on 14.07.2023. Hence, Registry was directed to issue notice to the petitioners 2 and 3, as the first petitioner was died. On issuance of notice to the petitioners 2 and 3, notice sent to the third petitioner was returned with an endorsement "no residence" and in respect of the second petitioner, despite the name being printed in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the second petitioner.

¶26

Therefore, there is no purpose in keeping this civil revision

¶27

petition on file. Hence, this civil revision petition stands dismissed for default . No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶28

03.08.2023

¶29

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sn

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/4

¶32

C.R.P(MD)No.1020 of 2017

¶33

¶34

1.The District Munsif Court, Srivaikundam.

¶35

2.The Section Officer Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/4

¶38

C.R.P(MD)No.1020 of 2017

¶39

C.KUMARAPPAN,J.

¶40

¶41

C.R.P(MD)No.1020 of 2017

¶42

03.08.2023

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/4

Perumal v. Arumugathammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perumal v. Arumugathammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvaraj, Vs Dr.J.Cyril Selvaraj

Bhovas, S/O.George, NO.34/40C Vs Johndurai

Kaliamoorthy, Vs S.Parvathy

V.Sankar@Sankarasubbu Vs K.L.R.Balasingh

Lakshmanaperumal Vs Mariammal

V.Dharmarajan, Vs K.Sonai, S/o.Karuppanan, Ambalam