Marikudumban Alias Mayakudumban v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the delay in disposal of an application for appointment of a commissioner. The court directed the District Munsif Court, Ottanchathiram, to dispose of the application within four weeks.
What did the court decide?
Directed the learned District Munsif, Ottanchathiram, to dispose of I.A.No.106 of 2022 within four weeks. Civil Revision Petition disposed of with no costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P PD(MD)No.102 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 19.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
C.R.P(MD)No.102 of 2023
- 1.Marikudumban @ Mayakudumban
- 2.Kaliyammal
- 3.Subramani
- 4.Marimuthu
- 5.Arumugam
- 6.Panchavarnam
... Petitioners
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the lower court to dispose of the application for appointment of commissioner within a specific time frame?
Whether to allow the civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.Marikudumban @ Mayakudumban and others
- respondent
The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Dindigul District
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Palani
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District
- respondent
The Block Development Officer, Office of the Block Development Office, Panchayat Union Office, Ottanchathiram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court