Palaniappan v. Kasi
Case brief
What is this about?
In a civil revision petition, the High Court of Madras confirmed the eviction order against a tenant. The court directed the petitioner to vacate the premises by 31.10.2023 to make way for the landlord's son's business.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to vacate premises on or before 31.10.2023; costs directed against petitioner.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.975 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.07.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Civil Revision Petition No.975 of 2023
and CMP No. 7220 of 2023 ---
Palaniappan .. Petitioner
Versus
Kasi .. Respondent
PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to allow the civil revision petition and set aside the fair and decretal order passed in RCA No.313 of 2017 on the file of VIII Small Causes Court, Chennai dated 22.12.2022 confirming the fair and decretal order
passed in RCOP.No.632 of 2015 on the file of XVI Small Causes Court, Chennai, dated 28.03.2017.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the eviction order passed by the Rent Controller Appellate Authority in a tenant-resource dispute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Palaniappan
- respondent
Kasi
Coram
V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court