Disposed

G.Kasthuri v. The Special Tahsildar (L.a) Cell- II

Madras HC22 Dec 2023CRP/5012/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 sought directions for the speedy disposal of an execution petition pending since 2017. The Court, noting the inaction and lack of disbursement, directed the Sub Ordinate Judge to dispose of the matter within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Sub Ordinate Judge, Poonamalle to dispose of E.P.No.64 of 2017 within three months.

G.Kasthuri Vs The Special Tahsildar (L.a) Cell- II — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P.No.5012 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 22.12.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

C.R.P.No.5012 of 2023

¶7

G. Kasthuri

¶8

G. Sathya Kumari .... Petitioners

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

The Special Tahsildar (l.A) Cell-II, M.M.D.A Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶11

The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Nandanam, Chennai -600 035.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the learned Sub Ordinate Judge, Poonamalle to dispose of the E.P.No.64 of 2017 in L.A.O.P.No.106 of 1992.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Bharathi Kumar

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶16

ORDER

¶17

C.R.P.No.5012 of 2023

¶18

The Revision Petition is filed to direct the learned Sub Ordinate

¶19

Judge, Poonamalle to dispose of the E.P.No.64 of 2017 in L.A.O.P.No.106 of 1992.

¶20

Since the relief claimed by the Revision Petitioner only seeking a direction for a speedy disposal, the notice to the respondents is dispensed with.

¶21

The learned counsel for Revision Petitioner would submit that the execution petition was pending from the year 2017 without any progress and the respondents have not disbursed the compensation so far. Therefore, he wanted to direct the trial court to dispose the case as early as possible.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances and also the fact that the

¶23

execution petition is pending from the year 2017 without any progress, this Court is inclined to direct the Sub Ordinate Judge, Poonamalle to

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶25

C.R.P.No.5012 of 2023

¶26

dispose of the E.P.No.64 of 2017 in L.A.O.P.No.106 of 1992 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order

¶27

With the above directions, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed

¶28

of. No costs.

¶29

22.12.2023

¶30

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No sma

¶31

¶32

Sub Ordinate Judge, Poonamalle

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶34

C.R.P.No.5012 of 2023

¶35

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶36

sma

¶37

C.R.P.No.5012 of 2023

¶38

22.12.2023

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

G.Kasthuri v. The Special Tahsildar (L.a) Cell- II

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Kasthuri v. The Special Tahsildar (L.a) Cell- II

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Djegadesan Vs Parameswari

Presitha Vs Sumod Kumar

G.Sarika Vs R.Sridhar

J.R.K. Anandharamanna Vs Msm Theater

Kamala Vs K.Periyasamy

Kamala Vs K.Periyasamy