Allowed

Vidya.R v. Anand Vaidyanathan

Madras HC7 Nov 2023CRP/3877/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a wife earning no income, filed a civil revision petition for speedy disposal of pending divorce and interim maintenance proceedings. The Court directed the trial court to finalize all pending petitions including arrears within three months. Notice was dispensed with.

What did the court decide?

Directed trial court to dispose of pending petitions including interim maintenance and arrears within three months from receipt of this order.

Vidya.R Vs Anand Vaidyanathan — Maintenance and Alimony | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P.No.3877 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

C.R.P.No.3877 of 2023

R.Vidya

... Petitioner

-Vs-

Anand Vaidyanathan 2. Radha Vaidyanathan

¶11

Uma Ravishankar ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to order timely disposal pf DVC No.18 of 2022 along with all pending interim applications pending before the Hon'ble XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet within a stipulated time.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Ghousi Banu

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶15

ORDER

¶16

C.R.P.No.3877 of 2023

¶17

The Revision Petitioner herein is the wife filed a petition in D.V.C.No. 18 of 2022 before the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai. She is living with her child without any source of income. So, she has already filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.1273 of 2022 praying for interim maintenance, for that, the respondent is not cooperating. Furthermore, in the present D.V.C. proceedings, he is not paying arrears of maintenance as well as not complied the order of interim maintenance. All the petitions are not disposed of and the same are pending. Hence, she preferred this Civil Revision Petition to dispose the petitions as early as possible.

¶18

Since the relief claimed by the Revision Petitioner only seeking a direction for a speedy disposal, the notice to the respondent is dispensed with.

¶19

E-court status perused. On perusal of records, it reveals that the Revision Petitioner filed the Crl.M.P.Nos. 1273 and 1274 of 2022 and the same are pending without any progress. Furthermore, the husband also not paying the maintenance and not obeyed the order passed by the trial judge. On considering the conduct of her inlaws as well as her husband, as on

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶21

C.R.P.No.3877 of 2023

¶22

date, arrears of maintenance was also pending. Therefore, this Court is inclined to direct the trial judge to take the petitions on file and dispose the interim petitions including arrears of maintenance as expeditiously as possible within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order, since because she is living with her child without any source of income. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶23

07.11.2023

¶24

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No rpp

¶25

¶26

The XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶28

C.R.P.No.3877 of 2023

¶29

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶30

rpp

¶31

C.R.P.No.3877 of 2023

¶32

07.11.2023

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Vidya.R v. Anand Vaidyanathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vidya.R v. Anand Vaidyanathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gomathi Vs S.Gokul

Chinthamani Vs Kalyani

P.Vishnuraghav Vs N.Manjula Devi

K.Chithra @ Sumithra Vs T.Sankar

Bhuvaneswari Vs Ilambharathi

P.N. Seethalakshmi Vs G. Ambikesh