Disposed

M. Venkatesan, v. Jayapriya Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd.

Madras HC11 Jan 2023CRP/3855/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court disposed of a civil revision petition challenging an execution order that attached petitioners' salaries. Upon counsels representing willingness to settle the remaining award amount, the court granted a final deadline for payment, failing which the original execution order remains enforceable.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted time to settle the remaining award amount by 20.02.2023; failed to do so, the original execution order attaching salaries shall stand enforced.

M. Venkatesan, Vs Jayapriya Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P.No.3855 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.01.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

C.R.P.No.3855 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.19632 of 2016

¶7

M.Venkatesan

¶8

C.Nithyakumar Legaz

¶9

D.Sivachandramohan ... Petitioners

¶10

¶11

Jayapriya Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Foreman, Near Krishnalaya Theatre Complex, Lawrence Road, Cuddalore-607001. ... Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC, as against the E.P.No.15 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore in A.R.No.1050 of 2013 on the file Deputy Registrar of Chits, Cuddalore order dated 23.11.2015 of the Principal District Munsif Cuddalore in Award No.1050 of 2013 dated 23.12.2013 of Deputy Registrar of Chits, Cuddalore.

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Venkatesan

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

for M/s Sneha For Respondent : Mr.C.A.Anburaja ORDER

¶16

C.R.P.No.3855 of 2016

¶17

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed as against the order passed in E.P.No.15 of 2015 in A.R.No.1050 of 2013 dated 23.11.2015 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore, thereby allowed

¶18

the execution petition and ordered to attach the salaries of the petitioners 2 and 3 herein.

¶19

The respondent obtained an award in Award No.1050 of 2013 as against the petitioners herein. In pursuant to the said award, the respondents filed an execution petition and the same was allowed. Aggrieved by the same, this present revision.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that

¶21

pending this revision, half of the amount was already settled and they are ready and willing to settle the remaining amount also.

¶22

Page 2 of 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.R.P.No.3855 of 2016

¶25

Considering the above submission, the petitioners shall settle

¶26

the remaining award amount, on or before 20.02.2023, failing which, the respondent is at liberty to proceed with the order passed in the execution petition in E.P.No.15 of 2015 in A.R.No.1050 of 2013 dated 23.11.2015 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore.

¶27

With the above directions, this Civil Revision Petition stands

¶28

disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No

costs.

11.01.2023

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No

¶33

¶34

The Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore.

¶35

The Deputy Registrar of Chits, Cuddalore.

¶36

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.J,

¶37

Page 3 of 4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

C.R.P.No.3855 of 2016

¶40

¶41

C.R.P.No.3855 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.19632 of 2016

¶42

11.01.2023

¶43

Page 4 of 4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M. Venkatesan, v. Jayapriya Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M. Venkatesan, v. Jayapriya Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Janakirama Reddy (Deceased) Vs Chakrapani Reddy (Deceased)

Pongiyammal Vs v.Kamalam

Shempark Public School Vs M/S.Edusmart Services P Ltd.

Rajamanickam Vs Natana Kunjithapatham

A.Tharsees Vs a.Arokiasamy

M/S Redsun Marbles Co. Vs Mrs.Karthika Devi