Savithiri v. Unnathal
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition under Article 227 sought directions for the expeditious disposal of an interlocutory application pending for over six years in a property partition suit. The High Court directed the District Judge to decide the application within three months.
What did the court decide?
The Principal District Judge at Tirupur was directed to dispose of I.A. No.708 of 2014 in OS.No.131 of 2009 within three months.
What the court decided
C.R.P. No. 2026 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :04.07.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN C.R.P. No. 2026 of 2023
Savithiri
...Petitioner
.Vs.
1.Tmt. Unnathal
- Mr. Thirumoorthy
- Tmt. Bhagiyalakshmi
- Palanisami
- Tmt. Sumathi
- Kaveriammal @ Pappammal
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Principal District Judge at Tirupur should be directed to dispose of the pending interlocutory application within a specific timeframe.
Whether an application pending for over six years regarding appointment of a commissioner requires acceleration.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Savithiri
- respondent
Tmt. Unnathal
- respondent
Mr. Thirumoorthy
- respondent
Tmt. Bhagiyalakshmi
- respondent
Palanisami
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court