K.M.Boopathi v. v.Sampath
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed civil revision petitions in a landlord-tenant dispute. It held that a petitioner who purchased the subject property during pendency proceedings became the owner and is entitled to implead themselves, contest the suit, and protect their rights as landlord.
What did the court decide?
Civil revision petitions allowed; Petitioners permitted to implead as landlord and contest the suit; Respondents directed to dispose the case within three months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 21.11.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
C.R.P.Nos.1794, 1797, 1798 and 1808 of 2023
1.K.M.Boopathi 2.S.P.Santhakumari ...Petitioners Vs.
1.V.Sampath 2.G.Nittyananthan 3.K.G.Ganeshkumar ...Respondents
Prayer in C.R.P.No.1794 of 2023: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order and decree made in I.A.No.11 of 2021 in I.A.No.17 of 2019 in RCOP No.9 of 2018 on the file of the District Munsif, Katpadi, Vellore District dated 11.04.2023. Prayer in C.R.P.No.1797 of 2023: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order and decree made in I.A.No.10 of 2021 in I.A.No.15 of 2019 in RCOP No.9 of 2018 on the file of the District Munsif, Katpadi,Vellore District dated 11.04.2023. Prayer in C.R.P.No.1798 of 2023: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order and decree made in I.A.No.9 of 2020 in RCOP No.9 of 2018 on the file of the District Munsif, Katpadi, Vellore District dated 11.04.2023.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a purchaser of immovable property acquired during the pendency of civil proceedings is entitled to implead as the landlord and defend the case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.M. Boopathi
- petitioner
S.P. Santhakumari
- respondent
V. Sampath
- respondent
G. Nittyananthan
- respondent
K.G. Ganeshkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court