J.Selvamani v. S.Selvi
Case brief
What is this about?
Responding to a civil revision petition against a condition requiring Rs.50,000 deposit for setting aside an ex-parte order, the High Court partially allowed the petition by reducing the deposit to Rs.30,000 to facilitate suit progress.
What did the court decide?
Condition for setting aside ex-parte order reduced to Rs.30,000 deposit.
What the court decided
CRP.No.1681 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
CRP.No.1681 of 2015
1.J.Selvamani 2.A.James 3.J.Stalin Sampathkumar 4.J.Santhi Premkumar 5.J.Chandrasekaran 6.R.Seema Priyadarshini 7.R.Arun Prasath 8.G.S.Sheela Thangam 9.S.Rajesh Dhinakar 10.S.Raagul Dhivakar
(petitioners 6 to 10 impleaded as party petitioners vide order of this Court dated 14.09.2023 made in C.M.P.Nos.8510 & 8513 of 2022) ... Petitioners
Vs
S.Selvi ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 20.03.2015, made in I.A.No.23 of 2015 in O.S.No.298 of 2009 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Perundurai.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condition to deposit Rs.50,000 for lifting ex-parte order under Order 9 Rule 7 is reasonable.
How to modify the deposit condition for setting aside ex-parte order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
J.Selvamani
- respondent
S.Selvi
Coram
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court