Dismissed
Muthu v. M.Rajendran(Died)
Madras HCCRP/1667/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court at Madras dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous after recording a letter from counsel stating the matter had become infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
C.R.P(PD)No.1667 of 2020
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED : 11.10.2023
¶4
CORAM :
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
¶6
Civil Revision Petition (PD) No.1667 of 2020
¶7
1.Muthu
¶8
2.Sivakumar
¶9
3.Ilayaraja ... Petitioners Vs. M.Rajendran (Died) 1.M.Jagadeesan
¶10
- 2.Muniammal
¶11
Chellamal (Died)
¶12
- 3.Pannaiammal
¶13
- 4.M.Mani
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Muthu
- petitioner
Sivakumar
- petitioner
Ilayaraja
- respondent
M.Rajendran (Died)
- respondent
M.Jagadeesan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court