Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that seeking amendment of the plaint alone during the final decree petition stage is not maintainable. The court granted liberty to withdraw the application and dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to withdraw the application; the application in I.A.No.54 of 1982 dismissed as withdrawn; CRP dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)No.1444 of 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.(PD)No.1444 of 2004
K.A.Krishnamoorthy .. Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.Jagadambal Ammal
- 2.Mallaiah @ Mohan
- 3.Basava
- 4.Krishnabai (Deceased)
- 5.Saraswathi
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition for amendment of the plaint alone, without amending the preliminary decree, is maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.A.Krishnamoorthy
- respondent
Jagadambal Ammal
Coram
V LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court