Dismissed

K. Subramanian, v. M. Anbalagan, S/O.Manickam

Madras HC12 Jun 2023CRL RC(MD)/31/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed revisions filed by an accused challenging orders allowing victims to recover money through bank transactions and dismissing his claim for money used for his own marriage. The court found no illegity as investigations concluded with a final report filed.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Revision Cases are dismissed and connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

K. Subramanian, Vs M. Anbalagan, S/O.Manickam — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31, 32 & 33 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31, 32 & 33 of 2019 and Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.1195 & 1196 of 2019

¶7

1.Crl.R.C(MD)No.31 of 2019:

¶8

K.Subramanian ... Revision Petitioner/

¶9

Accused No.1/Accused No.1

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.M.Anbalagan ... 1^st Respondent/ Petitioner/Victim

¶12

2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli. Crime No.26 of 2018. ... 2^nd Respondent/ Respondent/Complainant

¶13

PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.5989 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli, dated 19.11.2018.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For R – 1 : Mr.R.Anand for Mr.M.Maharaja

¶15

For R – 2 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/7

¶18

Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31, 32 & 33 of 2019

¶19

- 2.Crl.R.C(MD)No.32 of 2019:

¶20

K.Subramanian ... Revision Petitioner/ Accused No.1/Accused No.1

¶21

Vs.

¶22

1.R.R.Rajendran ... 1^st Respondent/ Petitioner/Victim

¶23

2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli. Crime No.26 of 2018. ... 2^nd Respondent/ Respondent/Complainant

¶24

PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.5990 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli, dated 19.11.2018.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For R – 1 : Mr.R.J.Karthick For R – 2 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶26

- 3.Crl.R.C(MD)No.33 of 2019:

¶27

K.Subramanian ... Revision Petitioner/ Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶28

Vs.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/7

¶31

Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31, 32 & 33 of 2019

¶32

The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli. Crime No.26 of 2018. ... Respondent/ Respondent/Complainant

¶33

PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.6857 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli, dated 19.11.2018.

¶34

For Petitioner : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶35

COMMON ORDER

¶36

These revisions have been filed to set aside the orders

¶37

passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.5989, 5990 and 6857 of 2018 respectively on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli, dated 19.11.2018.

¶38

2.In all three revision petitions, the petitioner is an accused in Crime No.26 of 2018 on the file of the respondent Police.

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

3/7

¶41

Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31, 32 & 33 of 2019

¶42

3.The first respondent in Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31 and 32 of 2019 are the victims. The victims lodged complaints alleging that the petitioner and others cheated the victims for celebrating the marriage between the victims with one Gayathri, who is one of the accused. The petitioner received huge amounts from the victims through bank transactions on various dates. After registration of F.I.R as against the petitioner and other accused persons for the offences under Sections 406, 417 and 420 of I.P.C., a sum of Rs.63,42,873/- and other assets from the accused persons were recovered and the same was deposited before the Court below in P.R.No.141 of 2018.

¶43

4.While pending investigation, the victims filed petitions in Crl.M.P.Nos.5989 and 5990 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli, for the return of cash which was paid by the victims. At the same time, the petitioner also filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.6857 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli, for the return of cash, claiming that the cash belonged to him. The Court below allowed the petitions filed by the victims in Crl.M.P.Nos.5989 and 5990 of 2018 and dismissed the

¶44

4/7

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31, 32 & 33 of 2019

¶47

petition filed by the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.6857 of 2018. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred these three revisions.

¶48

5.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶49

6.On perusal of the records revealed that all the transactions are through the bank and the petitioner and other accused persons duly received from the victims and they cheated them. Therefore, the trial Court rightly allowed the petitions filed by the victims and dismissed the petition filed by the first accused, namely the petitioner herein. That apart, now the Investigating Officer completed the investigation and filed a final report and the same has been taken cognizance in C.C.No.310 of 2023 and it is pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli. Therefore, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the orders passed by the Court below and all the revisions are liable to be dismissed.

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

5/7

¶52

Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31, 32 & 33 of 2019

¶53

7.Accordingly, these Criminal Revision Cases are

¶54

dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶55

12.06.2023

¶56

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ps

¶57

¶58

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli.

¶59

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli.

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶61

6/7

¶62

Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31, 32 & 33 of 2019

¶63

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶64

¶65

Order made in Crl.R.C(MD)Nos.31, 32 & 33 of 2019

¶66

12.06.2023

¶67

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶68

7/7

K. Subramanian, v. M. Anbalagan, S/O.Manickam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Subramanian, v. M. Anbalagan, S/O.Manickam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fathima Rameeza Vs Prabha

R.Manikandan Vs Revathy

Saba @ Sabarathinam Vs The Inspector of Police

Ravi Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Joseph Charles Vs Sakthidevi

A.Varghese, Vs M.Devendran