Dismissed

Jayaram Ramanaiah, v. Mrs. Lakshmi Devi

Madras HC17 Nov 2023CRL RC/775/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal revision was filed to set aside a family court judgment. The court dismissed the revision because the appellant claimed case records were returned to parties but were not produced for scrutiny, rendering adjudication impossible. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case Crl.R.C.No.775 of 2018 and connected Crl.M.P.No.8836 of 2018 are dismissed due to absence of case records; lower court directed to proceed if future petitions are filed.

Jayaram Ramanaiah, Vs Mrs. Lakshmi Devi — Maintenance and Alimony | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.R.C.No.775 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

The Honourable MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶6

Crl.R.C.No.775 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.8836 of 2018

¶7

Jayaram Ramanaiah ... Appellant

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

Mrs.Lakshmi Devi 2. Ms.Priyadarshini 3. Ms.Harshitha ... Respondents (2 and 3 Respondents Minors, rep by Mother)

¶10

Prayer:- Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w.401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 to set aside the Judgment passed by the learned VII Additional Family Court Judge at Chennai in M.C.No.254 of 2013 dated 08.12.2017.

¶11

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance

¶12

J U D G M E N T

¶13

This Criminal Revision Case had been filed to set aside the Judgment

¶14

dated 08.12.2017 passed in M.C.No.254 of 2013 by the learned VII

¶15

1/5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.R.C.No.775 of 2018

¶18

Principal Judge, VII Additional Family Court at Chennai.

¶19

2.On perusal of records, it is found that when the case came up for hearing before this Court on the earlier occasions, the learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner had made submissions that they had returned the case records to the party concerned. Therefore, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶20

The learned VII Principal Judge, VII Additional Family Court at Chennai is directed to proceed further, if any petition is filed by the Petitioner in M.C.No.254 of 2013 and dispose off the maintenance case. The learned VII Principal Judge, VII Additional Family Court at Chennai is also directed to proceed if any petition is filed by the wife seeking recovery of maintenance amount from the Husband by way of attachment of the salary or immovable properties as the case may be.

¶21

17.11.2023

¶22

shl Note: Issue order copy on 17.11.2023

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/5

¶25

Crl.R.C.No.775 of 2018

¶26

¶27

The VII Principal Judge, VII Additional Family Court, Chennai.

¶28

2.The Section Officer, VR Records, High Court, Chennai.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

3/5

¶31

Crl.R.C.No.775 of 2018

¶32

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.,

¶33

shl

¶34

Crl.R.C.No.775 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.8836 of 2018

¶35

17.11.2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

¶37

Crl.R.C.No.775 of 2018

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

Jayaram Ramanaiah, v. Mrs. Lakshmi Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayaram Ramanaiah, v. Mrs. Lakshmi Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Rajagopal Vs Velusamy Gounder

K.Govindaraj Vs Jagadess

K.Govindaraj Vs Gandheeswaran

Jerald Kinsley Vs Mary Suji

P.Jayavelu Vs G.Saroja

C.Rajendra Raj Vs N.Amudha