K.Thangaraj v. S.Saravanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Holding the accused guilty of cheque bounce, the High Court held a settlement was reached during hearing. The offence was compounded as the petitioner paid Rs. 50,000 and the complainant consented to withdraw the balance.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Revision Case is compounded as the offence; the Registry is directed to issue a certified copy of the receipt for withdrawal of Rs. 50,000.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.R.C.No.16 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 10.04.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Crl.R.C.No.16 of 2020
K.Thangaraj Proprietor Sri Sarranya Textile Mills, 72, Balaji Nagar 2nd Street, Opp to Hindu Kalvi Nilayam, Mamarathupalayam, Erode-638004. .. Petitioner
Vs.
S.Saravanan ..Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case has been filed under sections 397 read with 401 of Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the judgment dated 20.11.2019 passed in Crl.a.No.242/2018 on the file of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode, confirming the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.I, Erode in S.T.C.No.569 of 2017 dated 06.07.2018 and allow the above Criminal Revision petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Regunathan For Respondent : Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision Case filed against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be disposed of in light of the settlement reached by parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Thangaraj Proprietor Sri Sarranya Textile Mills
- respondent
S.Saravanan
Coram
Dr. Justice G.Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court