D.Ramdass v. v.Rajendiran
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition in a cheque dishonour case was dismissed. The High Court held that the accused was guilty as per settled law and did not have a valid reason to interfere since he failed to cross-examine the prosecution witness.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Revision No.1087 of 2023 was dismissed, upholding the previous judgment and order.
What the court decided
Crl.R.C.No.1087 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
Crl.R.C.No.1087 of 2023
D.Ramdass ... Petitioner Vs. V.Rajendran … Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the Judgment and orders dated 20.10.2021 passed in Crl.A.No.343 of 2019 by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.
For Petitioner : Mr.Krishnasamy Chinnasamy For Respondent : Mr.T.Arul
ORDER
Challenging the orders dated 20.10.2021 passed in
Crl.A.No.343 of 2019 by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, the present criminal revision is filed.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the conviction and sentence passed for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Whether the accused unfairly failed to cross-examine the prosecution witness presented by the lower courts.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Ramdass
- respondent
V. Rajendran
Coram
R. HEMALATHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court