Dismissed

Abdul Jabbar v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Sub Collector

Madras HC10 Oct 2023CRL OP(MD)/9298/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Crl. O.P. filed to quash criminal proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent. The bench held that since the matter was settled and the Jamaath administration taken over by the Collector, the petition became infructuous and was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition was dismissed as infructuous and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Abdul Jabbar Vs The Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P(MD)No.9298 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.10.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

Crl.O.P(MD)No.9298 of 2023 and Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.7602 and 7605 of 2023

¶7

1.Abdul Jabbar

¶8

2.S.Mohammed Saleem

¶9

3.Hameem Musthata

¶10

4.Mohammed Rafeeq

¶11

5.H.Abdul Rasaq

¶12

... Petitioners / Respondents

¶13

Vs.

¶14

1.The Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Sub Collector, Padmanabapuram, Kanyakumari District.

¶15

2.The Inspector of Police, Takkalai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶16

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent vide M.C.No.30 / 2023 dated 28.04.2023 and quash the same as illegal so far as the petitioner is concerned.

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Crl.O.P(MD)No.9298 of 2023

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aravinthan For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The Criminal Original Petition filed to call for the records relating

¶23

to the impugned proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent vide M.C.No.30 / 2023 dated 28.04.2023 and quash the same as illegal so far as the petitioner is concerned.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that because of the difference of opinion between two groups of Jamaath members, the proceedings have been initiated. Now the matter has been settled by the respondent. The said Jamaath Administration has been taken over by the District Collector, Kanniyakumari.

¶25

The said statement of the petitioner was also admitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side). In view of the developments, nothing survives for further adjudication in this case and the matter has become infructuous.

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Crl.O.P(MD)No.9298 of 2023

¶29

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as

¶30

infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶31

10.10.2023

¶32

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No pnn

¶33

¶34

1.1.The Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Sub Collector, Padmanabapuram, Kanyakumari District.

¶35

2.The Inspector of Police, Takkalai Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

¶36

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

3/4

¶39

Crl.O.P(MD)No.9298 of 2023

¶40

G.ILANGOVAN, J

¶41

pnn

¶42

Order made in Crl.O.P(MD)No.9298 of 2023

¶43

Dated 10.10.2023

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

4/4

Abdul Jabbar v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Sub Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Jabbar v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Sub Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.N Vedhachalam Vs The Superintendent of Police

J.Arockiyamary Vs The Superintendent of Police

Ganesan Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Pandi Selvi Vs The Superintendent of Police

Dinesh Kumar Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Tamilselvi Vs v.Palanisamy