Disposed

Aazhagi v. The Commissioner of Police

Madras HC1 Feb 2023CRL OP(MD)/823/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court exercised power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to dispose of a petition seeking a direction to the police to file a final report. The Court directed the respondent police to serve notice on the petitioner before she could file a protest petition.

What did the court decide?

Direct the second respondent to serve RCS notice on the petitioner before she files a protest petition. The petition stands disposed.

Aazhagi Vs The Commissioner of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.823 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 01.02.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.823 of 2023

Aazhagi

: Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai.

¶11

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Mathchayam Police Station, Madurai City. Crime No.1163 of 2016. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the second respondent to file a final report in Crime No.1163 of 2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sekar, For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.823 of 2023

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482

¶19

Cr.P.C., seeking orders to direct the second respondent to file a final report in

¶20

Crime No.1163 of 2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶21

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

¶22

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that the second accused was reported dead; that the first accused was mentally unsound and that after investigation, the second respondent has filed final report as further action dropped. He would further submit that R.C.S., notice was served on the petitioner.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no notice

¶24

was served on her.

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.823 of 2023

¶28

Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public

¶29

Prosecutor, the second respondent police is directed to serve R.C.S., notice on the petitioner/defacto complainant and on such receipt, the petitioner is at liberty to file a protest petition before the jurisdictional Court.

¶30

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition stands

¶31

disposed of.

¶32

01.02.2023

¶33

NCC : Yes/ No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das

¶34

¶35

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai.

¶36

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Mathchayam Police Station, Madurai City.

¶37

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶38

3/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.823 of 2023

¶41

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

¶42

das

¶43

Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.823 of 2023

¶44

Dated: 01.02.2023

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

4/4

Aazhagi v. The Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aazhagi v. The Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthusamy Selvam Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Vijaya Doss Vs The Superintendent of Police

Rajamanickam Vs The Inspector of Police

P.Chockkalingam Vs Muthusamy

Karuppasamy Vs The Inspector of Police

Suresh Vs The Sub Inspector of Police