Dismissed

Jhansirani @ Jhansi Mary v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Madras HC13 Jun 2023CRL OP(MD)/553/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR was disposed of as infructuous because investigation was completed and a final report filed as a mistake of fact.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition disposed of as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed; direction to serve RCS notice on third respondent.

Jhansirani @ Jhansi Mary Vs The Deputy… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.553 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 13.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.553 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.513 of 2023

¶7

Jhansirani @ Jhansi Mary ... Petitioner/2^nd Accused

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.

¶10

2.The Inspector of Police, Thuvakkudi Police Station, Thuvakkudi, Trichy District. (Crime No.171 of 2022)

¶11

....Respondents 1 and 2/Complainants

¶12

K.Anbalagan ... 3^rd Respondent/Defacto

¶13

Complainant

¶14

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in FIR in Crime No.171 of 2022 dated 14.12.2022 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal as against the petitioner concerned.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.553 of 2023

¶18

For Petitioner	: Mr.S.Krishnan
For R1 and R2	: Mr.S.Manikandan
	Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
For R3	: Mr.P.Banuprasath

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section

¶21

482 Cr.P.C., seeking orders to call for the records in FIR in Crime No. 171 of 2022 dated 14.12.2022 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal as against the petitioner concerned.

¶22

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that investigation has already been completed and final report has been filed before the concerned Court as 'Mistake of Fact'. He would further submit that RCS notice was not served on the third respondent/defacto complainant.

¶23

In view of the above said development, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this matter. Hence , this Criminal

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.553 of 2023

¶27

Original Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. However, the second respondent is directed to serve RCS notice to the third respondent/defacto complainant.

¶28

13.06.2023

¶29

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶30

Indu

¶31

¶32

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.

¶33

2.The Inspector of Police, Thuvakkudi Police Station, Thuvakkudi, Trichy District.

¶34

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶35

3/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.553 of 2023

¶38

G.ILANGOVAN,J.

¶39

Indu

¶40

Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.553 of 2023

¶41

Dated: 13.06.2023

¶42

4/4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Jhansirani @ Jhansi Mary v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jhansirani @ Jhansi Mary v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandramohan N Vs The Superintendent of Police

Ravichandran @ Dhanish Ravichandran Vs The Inspector of Police

Musthafa Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Kannappa Vs The Superintendent of Police

N.Chiraimeettan Vs The Superintendent of Police

L.S.Soundhara Rajan Vs The Inspector of Police