Virudhunagar. Based on the above said complaint, the first respondent registered F.I.R in Crime No.1 of 2011 for the offences under Section 406 & 420 of I.P.C and thereafter the first respondent without conducting proper investigation, filed final report as against these petitioners for the offences under Sections 408, 406 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. In fact, the accused borrowed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- from the second petitioner and to settle the above said amount, the disputed cheque was issued for a sum of Rs.3,00,000/-. When the cheque was presented for collection, it was returned and thereby cheque complaint was lodged by the 2nd petitioner as against the 2nd respondent and others and the same was ended in favour of the second petitioner and the second respondent and others were convicted by the trial Court. In the appeal, the trial Court judgment was reversed and the 2nd respondent herein was acquitted. As against the judgment of Appellate Court, the 2nd petitioner has preferred a Criminal Appeal in Crl.A.No.308 of 2018 before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court and the same is also pending. While so, the 2nd respondent has given false complaint against the petitioners. Therefore, the pending proceedings as against the petitioners is clear abuse of process of law. While pending proceedings, the 2nd respondent died and 6/13
