2.The case of the prosecution is that one Vimal Kumar called the defacto complainant and informed him that his uncle by name Anbukani was creating problem in a drunken mood and he requested him to take his uncle from the place of occurrence and that the defacto complainant and his friend by name Muniyandi went to the house of the deceased wherein the deceased was abusing his neighbor in filthy language and he refused to accompany the defacto complainant and four times, the deceased picked up the quarrel with the neighbors and others and he refused to accompany the defacto complainant. At the request of Vimal Kumar, the defacto complainant locked the deceased inside the house and locked the door from outside. When the defacto complainant and his friends were talking outside the house of the deceased, the deceased fell down from the upstairs of the house and after pacifying him to sleep, the defacto complainant, the petitioners and his friends went away from the scene of occurrence. On the next day on 22.10.2019, at about 08.30 a.m., on information from Vimal kumar, the defacto complainant went to his house and found the deceased died and he has given a complaint under Section 174 of Cr.P.C., to the respondent police.
