The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the Deputy Superintendent of Police to conduct an enquiry following the loss of dicta in Lalita Kumari, disposing of the Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Second respondent directed to conduct enquiry and pass orders in accordance with law; C.O.P. disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2959 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.02.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2959 of 2023
Sarasvathy
... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the first respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry on the basis of the false complaint given by the defacto complainant.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Azarudheen, for Mr.B.Mahendrarajan.
For Respondents : Mr.SS.Madhavan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
1/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2959 of 2023
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking orders, to direct the first respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry on the basis of the false complaint given by the defacto complainant.
Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1 and pass orders in accordance with law.
2/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2959 of 2023
4. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition stands
disposed of.
15.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No das
To
3/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2959 of 2023
K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.
das
Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2959 of 2023
Dated: 15.02.2023
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry under Section 482 Cr.P.C. regarding the false complaint against the petitioner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and OthersReferred¶21
Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others (2014) 2 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarasvathy
State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Aruppukottai
K.MURALI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
