Disposed

Rathina Sankar v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Jun 2023CRL OP(MD)/2293/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

While disposing of a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to expedite an old trial, the court dispensed personal appearance for the petitioner but directed the trial court to complete proceedings within five months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to dispose of the matter within five months and dispensation of petitioner's personal appearance.

Rathina Sankar Vs The Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2293 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 07.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2293 of 2023 and

¶7

Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.2046 and 2047 of 2023

¶8

Rathina Sankar ... Petitioner/4^th Accused

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi District. Thoothukudi. Crime No.19 of 2015. ...1^st Respondent/ Complainant/Complainant

¶11

Karukkuvel ... 2^nd Respondent/ List of Witness No.1/Defacto Complainant

¶12

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in pursuant to the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.588 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District in Crime No.19 of 2015 on the file of the 1^st Respondent and so far as the Petitioner is concerned.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/5

¶15

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2293 of 2023

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr. Muthumalai Raja S For R1 : Mr.S.Manikandan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking orders to call for the records in pursuant to the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.588 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District, in Crime No.19 of 2015 on the file of the 1^st Respondent and so far as the Petitioner is concerned.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he would be satisfied if dispense with personal appearance of the petitioner before the concerned trial Court is ordered.

¶20

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the

¶21

petitioner and considering that the petitioner is working as Deputy Tahsildar, his personal appearance before the concerned trial Court is dispensed on the following condition;

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2293 of 2023

¶25

(i)The petitioner shall appear before the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Thoothukudi, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file an undertaking affidavit, by affixing his recent passport size photograph, to the effect that he will appear before the trial Court as and when required and must ensure his proper representation through Advocate.

¶26

Another request of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that

¶27

considering the oldness of the matter, direction may be issed to the trial Court to expedite the trial process and complete the same within the time stipulated.

¶28

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit

¶29

that the first accused is reported to be dead and the warrant issued against the second accused was recalled on 29.03.2023 and the next hearing date for appearance of the accused is 26.06.2023.

¶30

Considering the oldness of the matter, there shall be a direction

¶31

to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Thoothukudi, to dispose the

¶32

3/5

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2293 of 2023

¶35

same within five months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶36

With the above said direction, this Criminal Original Petition is

¶37

disposed of. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶38

07.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶39

Indu

¶40

¶41

1.The learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Thoothukudi.

¶42

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi District. Thoothukudi.

¶43

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶44

G.ILANGOVAN,J.

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

4/5

¶47

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2293 of 2023

¶48

Indu

¶49

Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2293 of 2023

¶50

Dated: 07.06.2023

¶51

5/5

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Rathina Sankar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rathina Sankar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ponraj Vs The Commissioner of Police

Elango.G Vs The Commissioner of Police

Xavier Arulraj Vs The Superintendent of Police

Ram Kumar Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Kandasamy Adithiyan Vs The Inspector of Police

V.Senthil Kumaran Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police