Allowed

Prabhaharan v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC9 Oct 2023CRL OP(MD)/10834/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Crl.O.P. filed to quash charge sheet in C.C.No.75 of 2020 as against petitioners. Court noted compromise between petitioners and 2nd respondent and authorized recording. Proceeding allowed and proceedings quashed against petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Entire proceedings in C.C.No.75 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District quashed in respect of the petitioners alone.

Prabhaharan Vs The Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10834 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 09.10.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10834 of 2022 and Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.6811 and 6812 of 2022

¶7

Prabhaharan

¶8

Vinothkumar @ Vinoth

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai, Crime No.263 of 2019..

¶12

Manimaran

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, calling the records pertaining to C.C.No.75 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District and quash the same as against this petitioners.

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Vishnu For R1 : Mr.R.Sureshkumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.Mohamed

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/5

¶18

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10834 of 2022

¶19

O RDER

¶20

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.75 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

¶21

2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2^nd respondent, the 1^st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.263 of 2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC, against the petitioners. It appears that there is a small issue between the parties.

¶22

3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2^nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2^nd respondent and also by their respective counsels.

¶23

4.The petitioners and the 2^nd respondent appeared before this

¶24

Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were identified by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and the Investigation Officer. They were also appeared before the High Court

¶25

Legal Services Committee, Madurai. Both the parties were enquired by

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/5

¶28

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10834 of 2022

¶29

me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

¶30

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of

¶31

the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending and inclined to quash all further proceedings in C.C.No.75 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District in respect of the petitioners.

¶32

6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in C.C.No.75 of 2020, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners alone. The compromise memo is recorded and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶33

09.10.2023

¶34

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No PNM

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/5

¶37

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10834 of 2022

¶38

¶39

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

¶40

The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai, Crime No.263 of 2019.

¶41

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/5

¶44

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10834 of 2022

¶45

G.ILANGOVAN. J. PNM

¶46

ORDER IN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10834 of 2022 and Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.6811 and 6812 of 2022

¶47

09.10.2023

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

5/5

Prabhaharan v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhaharan v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Annapurani Vs The Superintendent of Police

A.Nijamutheen Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Sonaimuthu Vs The Inspector of Police

M.N Vedhachalam Vs The Superintendent of Police

J.Arockiyamary Vs The Superintendent of Police

Ganesan Vs The Sub Inspector of Police