16.03.2020. However, the second respondent failed to lodge any complaint on 16.03.2020 though she was accompanied by her mother and other two relatives. Further, the petitioner is living with her wife and two female children. According to the second respondent, she was wrongfully confined in the house of the petitioner. Even then, the first respondent did not even enquire any family member of the petitioner herein. Only one person was examined who is doing ironing in front of the house of the petitioner. He deposed that he had seen that on 13.03.2020, the petitioner dragged the second respondent into his house and thereafter on 16.03.2020, the second respondent was rescued by her family members. Even then, the said person did not lodge any complaint on 13.03.2020 even after seeing that the petitioner dragged the second respondent by holding her hands into his house. Therefore, all the allegations are cooked up only to drag the petitioner into this case. Further, in order to escape from the other liabilities, the petitioner has been now booked for false charges under Sections 363, 294 (b), 323, 343, 506 (ii) and 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4 of TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002.
