The Special Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner, arrested for non-penetrative sexual assault against a minor, posed a flight risk and could tamper with witnesses. The Court dismissed the bail petition.
Petitioner's bail petition was dismissed, and they remain in judicial custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.7572 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.7572 of 2023
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.02.2023, for the offences punishable under Section 366, 506(i) of IPC and Section 5(m) read with Section Section 6 of POCSO Act 2012 in Crime No.43 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
Crl.O.P.No.7572 of 2023
Spl.SC.No.130 of 2019 and the same was dismissed on 15.03.2023. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks bail for the petitioner.
2/4
Crl.O.P.No.7572 of 2023
Government Advocate (Crl.side) and perused the materials available on record.
and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for in this petition.
06.04.2023
gbi
Crl.O.P.No.7572 of 2023
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.
gbi
Crl.O.P.No.7572 of 2023
06.04.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged with offences under Section 366, 506(i) of IPC, Rape and PoCso Act.
Petitioner
State of Tamil Nadu
Jagaraj Chandira
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
