D.Mathubalan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive findings or legal principles. The petition was dismissed solely due to the petitioner's non-appearance and non-prosecution.
What the court decided
CRL.O.P.No.6780 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CRL.O.P. No.6780 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.4496 of 2021
D.Mathu Balan
... Petitioner
Versus
The State represented by Inspector of Police, Mangalamedu and Incharge Kailathur Police Station, Perambalur District. (Crime No.84 of 2001)
... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in S.C. in P.R.C.No.30 of 2018, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Perambalur and quash the same against the petitioner concern as illegal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Mathu Balan
- respondent
The State represented by Inspector of Police, Mangalamedu and Incharge Kailathur Police Station, Perambalur District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court