Allowed

Amudhavalli @ Amirthavalli v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC15 Jun 2023CRL OP/6532/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted a plea to quash an FIR alleging cruelty under Section 498A IPC. The court allowed the petition as the parties had arrived at a settlement and signed a Joint Compromise Memo, finding no useful purpose in keeping the proceedings pending.

What did the court decide?

The First Information Report in Crime No.8 of 2020 on the file of the 1st respondent police is quashed.

Amudhavalli @ Amirthavalli Vs the State Rep.by — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.6532 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 15.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.6532 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.4332 of 2021

¶7

1.Amudhavalli @ Amirthavalli

¶8

2.Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioners

¶9

Vs. 1.The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, W-28, All Women Police Station, Ambattur, Chennai – 600053.

¶10

2.Nithyakalyani ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.8 of 2020, on the file of the Inspector of Police, W-28, All Women Police Station, Ambattur.

¶12

For Petitioners : M/s.Vinod Paul Tyagaraj David

¶13

for M/s. David Tyagaraj

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran,Addl. Public Prosecutor [R.1] : M/s.A.E.Ravichandran [R.2]

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.O.P.No.6532 of 2021

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the

¶20

First Information Report in Crime No.8 of 2020, on the file of the Inspector of Police, W-28, All Women Police Station, Ambattur, for the alleged offence under Section 498(A) of IPC.

¶21

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsels for the petitioners and the second respondent submitted that parties have arrived at a settlement and the second respondent has decided to withdraw the allegations in the impugned First Information Report and prayed for quashing of the First Information Report on the basis of the Joint Compromise Memo.

¶22

3.Both the parties are present today and have signed the Joint Memo of Compromise a long with their learned counsels . The said Joint Memo of Compromise is taken on record. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the proceedings pending on the file of the 1st respondent Police. Hence, the impugned First Information Report in Crime No.8 of 2020 on the file of the 1st respondent police is quashed.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Crl.O.P.No.6532 of 2021

¶26

4.With the above observations, these Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶27

15.06.2023

¶28

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No shr

¶29

To,

¶30

The Inspector of Police, W-28, All Women Police Station, Ambattur, Chennai – 600053.

¶31

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.6532 of 2021

¶33

SUNDER MOHAN. J,

¶34

shr

¶35

Crl.O.P.No.6532 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.4332 of 2021

¶36

15.06.2023

¶37

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Amudhavalli @ Amirthavalli v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amudhavalli @ Amirthavalli v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State Rep by Vs C.Swaminathan

Tharaja Beevi Vs the State Rep by

M/S.Voora Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., Vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

Tamilselvi Vs State Rep.by

Sri Venkateshwara Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs N.Thilagavathy

Sri Venkateshwara Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs P.Nagarajan