K.Sekar v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed this Criminal Original Petition exercising no.horizontal jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings. The Court held that available material regarding alleged conspiracy justified proceeding to trial.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings to be completed within six months; compliance report to be filed.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.553 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P.No.553 of 2023 and
Crl.M.P.Nos.254 & 255 of 2023
K.Sekar
S/o.Late Kullan
... Petitioner
Vs.
State represented by its The Inspector of Police, CCIW CID, Salem.
... Respondent
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction should be exercised quashing proceedings where material exists to show conspiracy despite lack of sanction under Section 81 of the Co-operative Societies Act.
Whether no criminal proceedings recommended by the Special Officer under Section 81 of the Co-operative Societies Act precludes criminal prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Sekar
- respondent
State represented by its The Inspector of Police, CCIW CID, Salem
Coram
N.Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court