This judgment dismissed a Criminal Original Petition for non-prosecution. The court noted the petitioner failed to appear after obtaining interim protection and was delaying the matter, despite prior directions for hearing.
The Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.5493 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.5493 of 2023
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.,
When the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel for the intervenor would submit that the petitioner after obtaining interim protection from this Court, has not appeared before this Court. He would further submit that even on an earlier occasion on 31.03.2023, neither the petitioner nor the learned counsel for the petitioner appeared before this Court and thereby, this Court had directed the matter to be listed on 06.04.2023 under the caption “for dismissal” and on 20.04.2023, the learned counsel for the petitioner had appeared and submitted that settlement talks are going on and even thereafter, the petitioner had not approached the defacto complainant for settlement. He would also submitted that by virtue of the interim protection, the petitioner is delaying the matter.
3.In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
08.06.2023
drl
1/2
Crl.O.P.No.5493 of 2023
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA. J,
drl
Crl.O.P.No.5493 of 2023
08.06.2023
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the Criminal Original Petition for non-prosecution given the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue settlement.
Petitioner
A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
