K.Selvi v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail held unnecessary following police surrender post-cognizance in a Section 420 IPC case and closed the connected petition.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
Crl.OP.No.5263 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.4228 of 2021
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN. J.
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.07 of 2020 registered by the respondent Police for the offence under Section 420 of IPC.
2.It is stated by the respondent that charge sheet has been taken cognizance in C.C.No.89 of 2021 before the Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai.
- In view of that fact the petitioner is prepared to surrender before
the said Court. Hence, anticipatory bail would not arise.
4.Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition stands
dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
12.10.2023
smn
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable when the charge sheet has been submitted and cognizance taken under Section 420 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondent Police
Coram
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court