Allowed

Violet Mary v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Jan 2023CRL OP/480/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an IPC criminal case involving abuse, assault, and intimidation, citing prior enmity over property partition, subject to standard conditions including personal bonds, regular police reporting, and prohibitions on evidence tampering.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail ordered for release on execution of bond with two sureties, subject to conditions of police reporting and conduct.

Violet Mary Vs Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.480 of 2023

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.480 of 2023

¶3

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

¶4

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 324 & 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.2 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶5

The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant is that due to the previous enmity, with regard to the partition of the property, the accused have abused the de-facto complainant in a filthy language and assaulted him, causing grievous injuries. Hence the case.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent persons and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the de-facto complainant has lodged a false complaint due to the previous enmity. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶7

Page 1 of 4

¶8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶9

Crl.O.P.No.480 of 2023

¶10

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the de-facto complainant and the petitioner are relatives and due to the land dispute with regard to the partition of the property, the petitioner along with the other accused abused the de-facto complainant and assaulted him, due to which, he suffered grievous injuries on his face and head. He further submitted that investigation is almost completed, however, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

¶12

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.

¶13

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking note of the fact that the investigation is almost completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶14

Page 2 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.480 of 2023

¶17

Accordingly, the petitioner are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate No.II, Egmore, Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stands dismissed and on further condition that:

¶18

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶19

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of six weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

¶20

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶21

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶22

Page 3 of 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.O.P.No.480 of 2023

¶25

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶26

ham

¶27

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶28

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶29

20.01.2023

¶30

ham

¶31

Crl.O.P.No.480 of 2023

¶32

Page 4 of 4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Violet Mary v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Violet Mary v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rani @ Thenmozhi Vs State Rep.by

Murgan Vs the Inspector of Police

Murgan Vs the State Rep.by

V.Nandhakumar Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Angaleeswari Vs the Inspector of Police

Unni @ Madhusudhan Vs the State Rep.by