Allowed

M.Dinesh Babu v. the State Rep.by Its

Madras HC3 Nov 2023CRL OP/4248/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a criminal original petition filed to quash proceedings in CC.No.6 of 2021 for offences under Section 498A IPC based on matrimonial disputes. The court quashed the proceedings because the matter was amicably settled and the respondent voluntarily withdrew all complaints.

What did the court decide?

The criminal proceedings in CC.No.6 of 2021 are quashed and the petition is allowed.

M.Dinesh Babu Vs the State Rep.by Its — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.OP.No.4248 of 2021

¶2

'IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 03.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.OP.No.4248 of 2021 and

¶7

Crl.MP.No.2707 of 2021

¶8

1.M.Dinesh Babu 2.Cherukur Mani 3.Gunavathy

4.Poornima

... Petitioners

Vs.

1.The State rep. by its Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Poonamallee, Chennai

¶13

2.Monisha

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER :

¶16

Criminal original petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for

¶17

the records of the proceedings in CC.No.6 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial

¶18

Magistrate-I, Poonamallee and to quash the same as one without jurisdiction.

¶19

For Petitioners : Mr.Govind Chandrasekhar

¶20

For Respondents For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate(Crl.side)

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 of 4

¶22

Crl.OP.No.4248 of 2021

¶23

For R2 : Mr.K.R.Ramesh Kumar

¶24

ORDER

¶25

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in charge sheet in CC.No.6 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee taken cognizance for the offences under Section 498(A) of IPC as against the petitioners.

¶26

Both the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the second respondent submitted that now matter has been amicably settled between the first petitioner and the second respondent. The domestic violence complaint filed as against the petitioners has been withdrawn by the second respondent in view of the return of all seedhana articles by the petitioners. The complaint lodged as against the first petitioner before Bar Council of Tamilnadu has also been withdrawn by the second respondent. Therefore, the second respondent has no objection to quash the impugned proceedings.

¶27

In view of the above submissions, the entire proceedings in CC.No.6 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee is quashed and this criminal original petition is allowed. Consequently, connected https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 4

¶28

Crl.OP.No.4248 of 2021

¶29

miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶30

03.11.2023

¶31

Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking order/non-speaking order lok

¶32

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 4

¶34

Crl.OP.No.4248 of 2021

¶35

lok

¶36

¶37

1.The Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee

¶38

2.Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Poonamallee, Chennai

¶39

3.The Government Advocate, High Court of Madras

¶40

Crl.OP.No.4248 of 2021

¶41

03.11.2023

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 4

M.Dinesh Babu v. the State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Dinesh Babu v. the State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Tagore Educational Trust- Vs the Tamil Nadu Pollution

T.R. Pachamuthu @ Paari Vs S.Mukanchand Bothra

J.Sabura Vs State Rep by

M/S.Inox Wind Limited Vs Surface Transport Carriers of India

Vijay Anand Vs State by

Rajaram Vs State Rep.by